[Eril-l] Evaluation rubric

[Angela Galvan]

I use a modified version of the rubric found here:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315563

Karen R. Harker, Laurel Crawford, and Todd Enoch, "Keeping it Real: A
Comprehensive and Transparent Evaluation of Electronic Resources" (2014).
Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference.

-Angela

Angela Galvan
Digital Resources and Systems Librarian
SUNY Geneseo
galvan at geneseo.edu

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Nathan Carlson <
Nathan.Carlson at metrostate.edu> wrote:

> How do you evaluate new electronic resources? How do you assess the ones
> you have had for a while? Do you get input on these decisions from other
> faculty or students?
>
>
>
> Do you have some sort of rubric, with evaluation criteria built in, that
> you would share with us?
>
>
>
> I would love to know how others manage this process. Thanks!
>
>
>
> Nathan Carlson
>
> E-resources & Discovery Librarian
>
> Assistant Professor, Information Studies
>
> Metropolitan State University Library
>
> 651.793.1623
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eril-l mailing list
> Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
> http://lists.eril-l.org/listinfo.cgi/eril-l-eril-l.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20160219/5e2a58ad/attachment-0001.html>