[Eril-l] Wall Street Journal Site License Questions
Electronic Resources in Libraries discussion list
eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
Wed Apr 15 09:44:21 PDT 2026
We've had a site license for several years and our usage has consistently been through the roof. While I haven't compared the site license use to the use on PQ aggregator databases, I'm also of the opinion that for newspaper resources the database interface is a hindrance. You also get classroom packs and a lot of the web content with a site license along with the confidence that the content is up to date. (A quick check of the WSJ eastern edition from PQ shows that the most recent content is from yesterday.) The archival content from the WSJ proper dates back to 1998.
It's been my understanding that with SSO authentication users won't have to create a separate account. We quite literally just got that set up though so others may know more.
Sarah
________________________________
Sarah Mueth, MSLIS
Serials & Electronic Resources Librarian | UNCW Library<http://library.uncw.edu/>
University of North Carolina Wilmington
910.962.2497
she/her/hers
________________________________
From: Eril-l <eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org> on behalf of Electronic Resources in Libraries discussion list via Eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 11:10 AM
To: Electronic Resources in Libraries discussion list <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>
Subject: [Eril-l] Wall Street Journal Site License Questions
[This email originated from outside of UNCW]
Looking for more information for those who have a WSJ site license for their campuses.
We have had ProQuest's Wall Street Journal online for many years, and despite faculty saying they want, need, and have students use it, use has dropped to the point where I told our business school that they had to split the cost to continue the subscription. I know that the current ProQuest interface is probably not the best for use and inquired about site licensing from the WSJ directly. Their quote is on par with what we're paying now and I believe the site license would increase use greatly.
However, I'm finding somewhat conflicting information about site license coverage and implementation based on what I see from other universities' subscriptions. Here are my questions:
-If you have the Campus-Wide Access site license what is the date coverage? The WSJ rep said archival coverage is back to 1998, but I see other institutions list a 4 year cut off.
-WSJ says they are SSO compatible, and as we have Open Athens integrated with Azure, can do that easily. However, do users still have to make a separate account with WSJ or can the SSO be carried through to accomplish that as well?
Are there any other site license issues/complexities we should be aware of? We are not in a financial position to do both ProQuest and a site license; it has to be one or the other.
Thanks in advance,
Dana
Dana Mastroianni, MLIS
Manager, Library & Public Services | Jennie King Mellon Library<http://library.chatham.edu/>
Office: 412.365.1602
Chatham University | Woodland Rd. Pittsburgh, 15232
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20260415/c94684b0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Eril-l
mailing list