[Eril-l] Cambridge adopted the same bad platform as Taylor & Francis?

Tue Sep 20 08:58:45 PDT 2016

Hi Jennifer,

Thanks for your interest in this.

The former – these changes are currently in development.

Best regards,
Tristan

From: Jennifer Sauer [mailto:jsauer at fhsu.edu]
Sent: 20 September 2016 16:43
To: Tristan C Collier <tcollier at cambridge.org>; eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>
Subject: RE: [Eril-l] Cambridge adopted the same bad platform as Taylor & Francis?

Hi Tristan. Thanks for your detailed response to the list-serv. In light of your comments about the ability to limit to limit to accessible content, the range of preferences globally, and this comment you made ----

“We are looking to improve the display of what users have access to – we are considering how to show access symbols on the all issues page as well as at the article/journal page/chapter/book levels.”

I would say placing those access symbols is imperative. Does the word “considering” mean your developers are trying to solve the question of how to do that, or simply that you are weighing the value of and demand for doing that?

Best regards,
Jennifer

Jennifer Sauer, MLIS
Scholar Services and Electronic Resources Librarian
Forsyth Library: Explore-Collaborate-Create

Fort Hays State University
600 Park
Hays, KS  67601
(785)628-5262 (O)
(785)628-5415 (F)

From: Eril-l [mailto:eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org] On Behalf Of Tristan C Collier
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:29 AM
To: eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org<mailto:eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>>
Subject: Re: [Eril-l] Cambridge adopted the same bad platform as Taylor & Francis?

Hi Heather and Stephen,

Thanks for your questions on this point.

Cambridge Core doesn’t allow that box to be checked by default currently. Globally there are a range of views from libraries about that option, so to balance our solution for as many libraries as possible, we’ve left it unchecked but made it very prominent on our homepage.

Of course, you are welcome to feed in that you don’t agree with this solution (as you are doing) and we will continue to assess the feedback.  I hope this seems fair.

Best wishes
Tristan

__________________________________________

Tristan Collier
Senior Library Marketing Manager,
Institutional Marketing

Cambridge University Press
University Printing House
Shaftesbury Road
Cambridge, CB2 8BS
England, UK
http://www.cambridge.org/core

From: Eril-l [mailto:eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org] On Behalf Of Heather Shipman
Sent: 20 September 2016 15:48
To: Stephen Francoeur <stephen.francoeur at gmail.com<mailto:stephen.francoeur at gmail.com>>; Pennington, Buddy D. <penningtonb at umkc.edu<mailto:penningtonb at umkc.edu>>; Steve Oberg <steve.oberg at wheaton.edu<mailto:steve.oberg at wheaton.edu>>; eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org<mailto:eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>>
Subject: Re: [Eril-l] Cambridge adopted the same bad platform as Taylor & Francis?

We’re getting questions about that from patrons, too. I don’t see a setting for it in the admin console, nor any mentions of the function in the FAQ.

Looks like Tech Support contact info is here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/contact . I suspect their speed on fixing it will be proportional to how many of us ticket it.

[Thumbnail2]
Heather Shipman
E-resources Acquisition Specialist
110 Olin Library, Cornell University
Heather.shipman at cornell.edu<mailto:Heather.shipman at cornell.edu> ; 607-254-1499

From: Eril-l [mailto:eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Francoeur
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 4:14 PM
To: Pennington, Buddy D.; Steve Oberg; eril-l
Subject: Re: [Eril-l] Cambridge adopted the same bad platform as Taylor & Francis?

Does anyone know if we can set the "Only search content I have access to" checkbox so that by default it is checked? I'd prefer to limit people to the content we actually have access to and then let them change that if they want to expand the scope of their search.

Stephen Francoeur
User Experience Librarian
Baruch College
New York, NY

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:58 PM Pennington, Buddy D. <penningtonb at umkc.edu<mailto:penningtonb at umkc.edu>> wrote:
I agree. I think we are seeing the beginnings of a shift from a binary world of desktops vs mobile, to a spectrum of screens, and providers want to both simplify design and maintenance of their platform and provide a consistent look across that spectrum.

Buddy Pennington
Director of Collections and Access Management
University of Missouri--Kansas City
308 Miller Nichols Library
800 East 51st St.
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
penningtonb at umkc.edu<mailto:penningtonb at umkc.edu>
816-235-1548
UMKC Libraries<http://library.umkc.edu/>

From: Eril-l [mailto:eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org<mailto:eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org>] On Behalf Of Steve Oberg
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 2:51 PM

To: eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org<mailto:eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>>
Subject: Re: [Eril-l] Cambridge adopted the same bad platform as Taylor & Francis?

I’m not proposing or in favor of “dumbing down” or “least common denominator”. The fact remains that in the information technology realm, there are now (or soon will be) more people accessing content of whatever kind via a mobile device than a desktop or laptop computer. Content providers should respond to that if they want to remain relevant and useful.

Designing and maintaining a platform that supports multiple screen sizes and especially, multiple and sometimes very different use cases, is pretty difficult and expensive. I’m not arguing that content providers/publishers shouldn’t bother addressing various needs, or be given a pass. Instead, I’m simply reminding of the reality of what they face, and a broader trend that I think they might be paying attention to.

Hopefully they are “listening” and this type of discussion will be beneficial for them in shaping or reshaping their platforms.

Steve

Steve Oberg
Assistant Professor of Library Science
Electronic Resources and Serials
Wheaton College (IL)
+1 (630) 752-5852

NASIG Vice-President/President-Elect
[cid:image001.png at 01D21286.4FA35EB0]

_______________________________________________
Eril-l mailing list
Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org<mailto:Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>
http://lists.eril-l.org/listinfo.cgi/eril-l-eril-l.org

Cambridge University Press is the publishing business of the University of Cambridge with VAT registered number GB 823 8476 09.  Our principal office is at University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS, United Kingdom.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20160920/d48f1297/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2094 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20160920/d48f1297/attachment-0001.jpg>