[Eril-l] Millennium ERM fixed-length record field variables
Beth Johns
bmjohns at svsu.edu
Thu Sep 3 06:12:34 PDT 2015
Following.
I'm not a new librarian, but new to ERM management. We use Sierra. Same boat, ERM was installed around 2012 and very little done since then. Our periodicals assistant handles coverage loads. It's all a bit confusing since I have a reference background, not a tech services background!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Annie Erdmann" <erdmann at simmons.edu>
To: "Katherine Holvoet" <Kate.Holvoet at zu.ac.ae>
Cc: eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 8:49:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Eril-l] Millennium ERM fixed-length record field variables
Hi Kate,
I was in the same place you are right now three years ago. I inherited the Millennium ERM module and after examining it's functionality, we switched to Coral, an open source ERM that is built on a SQL database.
Here is more information on Coral.
http://coral-erm.org/
annie
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annie Erdmann
Digital Assets/ eResources Librarian
Simmons College Library
Boston MA 02115
617-521-2723
erdmann at simmons.edu
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Katherine Holvoet < Kate.Holvoet at zu.ac.ae > wrote:
I am a new e resources librarian and I have inherited a Millennium ERM that was set up I n 2009 by an unpaid intern, and pretty much not touched since then. I am going through the system and making some changes to have it better suit our needs, particularly in terms of Millennium statistics (not resource use stats, but the stats on the resource records themselves). To do this I want to make some changes to our fixed fields, and I am looking for examples of what other libraries have done. If your library has added any options to the fixed fields, I’d love to see what those choices are for following fixed fields:
172 Rights Type
The default variables are Not Evaluated, Licensed, Public Domain, Copyright, Deed – Yes, Deed – No, Archival Terms, and Unknown. I’m thinking of adding Site License, Limited Users, and No License Required to meet mandatory reporting requirements on those three categories.
179 Package Type
The default options are all about the full-textness of the database (full, none, partial, digital object). We don’t have to report on that information, and the intern choose a bunch of descriptive terms that seem to be resource types, like database, single title, aggregator, ejournal pkg, etc. I actually kind of lean in that direction, but I’m not sure when I would be called upon to provide that kind of data. My other thought is that Package Type could list attributes like one-time purchase, subscription, free resource, free vendor add-on because I do have to track that and report on how many subscriptions we have, and when we receive a database for free from the vendor as an add on to another package. But! These options could go down to the ECODE lines (unless I find something better to put there). It seems a waste to not use Package Type for something useful.
174 ECODE1
Currently labeled Content Sensitive. I have no idea what that mean, and only 8 resources were flagged with an option (accepted, rejected, under consideration, and special collections) other than the default, and I could not see anything in common about those 8. I’m definitely looking to use this field for something more interesting.
175 ECODE2
Currently labeled Statistics. I think it was an attempt to track which resources provide usage statistics. Only seven were flagged as yes, and 1 flagged as no, the rest were set to the default, which is no information.
176 ECODE3
Currently labeled Purchase Review. No resources had anything other than the default.
177 ECODE4
Currently labeled Library Review. Options seem to be complete, liaison review, partial, and unevaluated, only 7 records had an option other than the default.
Thank you all for your help and time!
Kate Holvoet
Zayed University
Katherine Holvoet
Electronic Resources Librarian
Library and Learning Commons
كاثرين هولفويت
أمين مكتبة المراجع الإلكترونية
المكتبات و موارد التعلـّم
P.O. Box 144534 Abu Dhabi, U.A.E | T: +971 2 599 3116 | M:
w w w . z u . a c . a e
Accredited by Middle States Commission on Higher Education
Disclaimer: This e-mail and the files(s) attached to it are confidential and belong to the intended receiver (unit) only. In case you are not the intended receiver of this letter, or if you have received it by mistake, please advise the sender and delete it along with its attached file(s) from your system immediately. You do not have the right to copy, print or distribute this e-mail or any part thereof, or to release its contents to any other party whatsoever, except with prior approval from the sender. If you violate the above, you will be legally accountable.
_______________________________________________
Eril-l mailing list
Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
http://lists.eril-l.org/listinfo.cgi/eril-l-eril-l.org
_______________________________________________
Eril-l mailing list
Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
http://lists.eril-l.org/listinfo.cgi/eril-l-eril-l.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20150903/49506313/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: zu9d5c92
Type: image/gif
Size: 5989 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20150903/49506313/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: msche8b9598
Type: image/gif
Size: 3156 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20150903/49506313/attachment-0001.gif>
More information about the Eril-l
mailing list