[Eril-l] Two "home sites" for same journal, does DOI define canonical/authoritative?

Fri Sep 5 06:03:58 PDT 2025

Maybe this clarifies it:

" CrossRef DOIs conventionally link the user to a single source of material
but, in select circumstances, an item might exist in multiple locations or
formats. The DOI specification supports a practice called multiple
resolution in which multiple URLs may be attached to a single DOI. As
implemented by CrossRef, instead of delivering the user directly to
content, the DOI resolves to an interim page containing citation metadata
and multiple links to an item. This feature has been enthusiastically
adopted by members who co-publish journals, as it allows them to dually
host an authoritative version of an article."
https://www.niso.org/niso-io/2010/06/dois-journals-linking-and-beyond

Susan R. Barber
Electronic Resources Coordinator
Paul and Rosemary Trible Library
Christopher Newport University
sbarber at cnu.edu
757-594-7046

On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Electronic Resources in Libraries discussion
list via Eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org> wrote:

> Thank you; a lot of this makes sense to me.
>
> However, a DOI can only ever point to one URL. There is no mechanism for a
> specific DOI to point to more than one.
> If an article is available on more than one platform, each will have
> different DOIs. I've seen this with JSTOR archival journal articles, for
> instance.
> One of the major reasons for DOIs is that if the publisher changes their
> platform so old direct article links would break, or the content is moved
> to another platform through the sale or other kind of transfer/partnership,
> the endpoint platform would tell Crossref etc. that that DOI now needs to
> point to the new location.
>
>
> Melissa Belvadi
> mbelvadi at upei.ca
> Make an appointment: https://mbelvadi.youcanbook.me/
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Eril-l <eril-l-bounces at lists.eril-l.org> on behalf of Electronic
> Resources in Libraries discussion list via Eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
> >
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 3, 2025 2:34 PM
> *To:* Electronic Resources in Libraries discussion list <
> eril-l at lists.eril-l.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Eril-l] Two "home sites" for same journal, does DOI
> define canonical/authoritative?
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of UPEI. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe. If you are uncertain, please use the Report Message button in Outlook
> and delete this email.
>
>
>
> *WARNING:* The sender of this email could not be verified and may not
> match the person in the 'FROM' field. Do not click links or open
> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> If you are uncertain, please use the Report Message button in Outlook and
> delete this email.
>
>
> Hi, Melissa,
>
> Sometimes you end up with the two sites for the same journals when a
> journal is hosted on a platform, but then for whatever reason, the
> publisher decides to host it on their own platform either additionally or
> while ending current access on the platform.
> However, if the publisher made a deal with the platform for them to host
> content and sell it with perpetual access rights then you still have access
> on the host site.
>
> So, for example if Journal of the Association of ABC Science didn't have
> the ability to host it on the Association website, they might make a deal
> with Science Direct to host the journal and allowed them to sell perpetual
> access rights to the consumer. In this scenario SD is acting as a hosting
> platform rather than Elsevier being the publisher.
>
> Then a decade later the Association website goes through an overhaul and
> they can host the journal themselves now. They canceled the SD contract,
> but since when they made the content originally, SD was allowed to sell it
> with par it stays on the SD platform for those years for those who
> purchased access through SD retain access to those years as they paid for
> those years with a contract that included perpetual  access.
>
> A DOI is a persistent identifier, but it does not specify a single URL, so
> it is possible the DOI may point to either or sometimes both places. If it
> points to both, there is usually a screen that comes up asking you to
> choose the platform - which confuses patrons, because they don't know which
> platform the library has the full-text with.
>
> And in some cases a journal could simply switch publishers for whatever
> reason, but again if the previous publisher was able to keep access to the
> years they published it then the DOI might show for that old publisher.
>
> I hope that makes sense.
>
> Susan
>
>
> Susan R. Barber
> Electronic Resources Coordinator
> Paul and Rosemary Trible Library
> Christopher Newport University
> sbarber at cnu.edu
> 757-594-7046
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:19 AM Electronic Resources in Libraries
> discussion list via Eril-l <eril-l at lists.eril-l.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I was exploring a situation involving a journal that has both a publisher
> website with its full text archive and also some kind of partnership with
> Elsevier so it also has a full text journal "home" site on ScienceDirect.
> (SD) I've run into this before but this is the first time I explored in
> more detail because our full text rights are not the same on both platforms
> for certain archival years.
>
> I used one specific article from 2013 as my test case.
> Both sites give the same DOI for that article, and through Crossref, that
> DOI takes you to the SD site, not the publisher site.
> I then tried searching the article title on Crossref just to be safe, and
> that too led to only one DOI which was the SD one.
>
> I am deliberately not naming the journal because the official information
> we got from the publisher is that they don't offer post-cancellation access
> (PCA, also sometimes called "perpetual access rights" or PAR), and we don't
> currently subscribe, and I don't want to draw attention to the fact that we
> do have PCA on SD for the years we paid for in the past, just not on the
> publisher website.  I have also verified that our access is not part of our
> "Big Deal" package with SD.
>
> What's going on here? Have any of you explored this kind of situation in
> more detail to figure out what's going on?
>
> More generally, what does it mean to the Schol Comm world for a journal to
> have apparently two co-equal (in an authoritative sense) home sites? If a
> citation to this article in another peer-reviewed journal gave the
> publisher's URL rather than using the DOI, would they be 'wrong'?
> I can see authors thinking the publisher's site is the "official" one.
> Does DOI override that? Should peer reviewers pay any attention to this, or
> journal editors?
>
>
> Melissa Belvadi
> Collections Librarian
> University of Prince Edward Island
> mbelvadi at upei.ca  902-566-0581
> ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4433-0189
> my public calendar
> <https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/0fbab27c909e4493be65313bd66d66b6@upei.ca/5fa60af92c6d451c9ddf90c0bb11e00f15552192987609852692/calendar.html>
> Make an appointment <https://mbelvadi.youcanbook.me/> via YouCanBookMe
> My pronouns are ಅವರು/ಅವರನ್ನು
> My emails are sent during the hours that I work and I understand that you
> will respond during the hours that you work.
> _______________________________________________
> Eril-l mailing list
> Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
> http://lists.eril-l.org/listinfo.cgi/eril-l-eril-l.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eril-l mailing list
> Eril-l at lists.eril-l.org
> http://lists.eril-l.org/listinfo.cgi/eril-l-eril-l.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20250905/a9b26138/attachment.htm>