[Eril-l] From a non-librarian: Attacks on librarians & free speech
Walter Miale
info at crittertunes.com
Fri Oct 21 15:54:17 PDT 2016
I am not a librarian but I subscribe because. . . well I don't know
exactly except that I find it exciting to be in potentially close
contact with so many librarians. . . . . . I am not sure this is an
appropriate post under the guidelines if any of this email list, but
here goes. Isn't it interesting? I would be interested to read
responses of subscribers. Here first is a highlight of the article:
As the guards grabbed Rothe-Kushel, Steve Woolfolk, the library's
director of programming, who had been watching from off stage,
interceded on Rothe-Kushel's behalf and defended his right to remain
in a public building and ask questions at a public forum; in a cell
phone video, Rothe-Kushel can be heard saying, "Ask me to leave [and]
I will leave." The guards led Woolfolk and Rothe-Kushel through the
green room toward the lobby. As Woolfolk rounded a pillar, several of
the guards grabbed Woolfolk from behind. Woolfolk was kicked in the
leg (resulting in a torn knee ligament), slammed against the pillar,
and thrown into a chair. When he bounced out of the chair onto the
floor, the guards forced him back into the chair, and handcuffed him.
Both men were arrested by a uniformed police officer who had been
summoned by Hawkins. Rothe-Kushel was charged with trespassing and
resisting arrest, and Woolfolk with interfering with an arrest.
Meanwhile, in the auditorium, the program continued; Ross answered a
few more questions.
Since May, the cases against both men have been pending. Cellphone
and security videos corroborate Rothe-Kushel's and Woolfolk's version
of events.
Walter Miale
www.greenworldcenter.org
www.itsyourmovie.org
imagesmiale.com
When Librarians Are Silenced
Francine Prose
October 14, 2016
<http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/10/14/kansas-city-librarian-arrest-for-defending-free-speech/>The
New York Review of Books
A librarian in Kansas City, Missouri was arrested for standing up for
a library patron's free speech rights. The right to read, to think,
to discuss and listen to ideas in a public forum is essential to an
open society, as is our individual privacy. One hopes that the Kansas
City case-only the most recent of many-will be resolved, and that
librarians there and everywhere will be able to do their jobs without
taking on the added burden of battling for our freedom.
Video footage showing Kansas City Public Library staff member Steve
Woolfolk being arrested, May 9, 2016,
<http://www.nybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/kasas-city-library-arrest.jpg>www.pitch.com
// The New York Review of Books,
Search the Internet for news stories about public libraries in
America and chances are that, sooner or later, the phrase "on the
front lines" will come up. The war that is being referred to, and
that libraries have been quietly waging since the September 11
attacks, is in defense of free speech and privacy-two concepts so
fundamental to our democracy, our society, and our Constitution that
one can't help noting how rarely their importance has been mentioned
during the current election cycle. In fact quite the opposite has
been true: Donald Trump has encouraged the muzzling of reporters and
the suppression of political protest, while arguing that government
agencies aren't doing enough spying on private citizens, especially
Muslims. Hillary Clinton has failed to be specific about what she
would do to limit surveillance, while her running mate,Tim Kaine, has
promised to expand "intelligence gathering." Meanwhile, public
libraries continue to be threatened by government surveillance-and
even police interference.
In the most recent such incident, a librarian in Kansas City,
Missouri was arrested simply for standing up for a library patron's
free speech rights at a public event featuring a former US diplomat.
Both the librarian and the patron face criminal charges. The incident
took place last May, but went largely unnoticed until several
advocacy groups called attention to the situation at the end of
September. In cooperation with the Truman Presidential Library and
the Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City, the Kansas
City Public Library had invited Dennis Ross-a former advisor on the
Middle East to Presidents George H.W. Bush and Barack Obama, and to
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and currently a
distinguished fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy-to speak about Truman and Israel at its Plaza Branch. The
library hosts between twelve and twenty speakers each month, and
though some of the topics and speakers have been controversial, the
events have always been peaceful.
As a matter of policy, the library declines to hire outside security
guards. But because of a recent, traumatic event in Kansas City-in
April 2014 a lone gunman attacked the Jewish Community Center and a
Jewish retirement home, killing three people-the library
administration agreed that three local off-duty policemen and Blair
Hawkins, a former Seattle police officer now serving as Head of
Security for the Jewish Community Foundation, could be present.
According to the library, as part of the agreement nobody was to be
prevented from asking a controversial question and the security team
would consult with library officials before ejecting any nonviolent
patrons. At the Dennis Ross event, audience members had their bags
searched as they entered the library.
During the question-and-answer session after Ross's address, a local
writer and activist named Jeremy Rothe-Kushel asked about US support
for what he called Israel's "state-sponsored terrorism." Ross
answered, and when Rothe-Kushel followed up with a more aggressive
question, Hawkins and one of the other guards approached him and
immediately tried to eject him from the building-despite the fact
that Rothe-Kushel posed no danger to the speaker or audience members.
One of the guards, Brent Parsons, shouted-incorrectly-that
Rothe-Kushel was at a private event. Later Parsons added, "This is
private property." It is revealing that a policeman should have
imagined, even in a heated moment, that a public library was private
property.
As the guards grabbed Rothe-Kushel, Steve Woolfolk, the library's
director of programming, who had been watching from off stage,
interceded on Rothe-Kushel's behalf and defended his right to remain
in a public building and ask questions at a public forum; in a cell
phone video, Rothe-Kushel can be heard saying, "Ask me to leave [and]
I will leave." The guards led Woolfolk and Rothe-Kushel through the
green room toward the lobby. As Woolfolk rounded a pillar, several of
the guards grabbed Woolfolk from behind. Woolfolk was kicked in the
leg (resulting in a torn knee ligament), slammed against the pillar,
and thrown into a chair. When he bounced out of the chair onto the
floor, the guards forced him back into the chair, and handcuffed him.
Both men were arrested by a uniformed police officer who had been
summoned by Hawkins. Rothe-Kushel was charged with trespassing and
resisting arrest, and Woolfolk with interfering with an arrest.
Meanwhile, in the auditorium, the program continued; Ross answered a
few more questions.
Since May, the cases against both men have been pending. Cellphone
and security videos corroborate Rothe-Kushel's and Woolfolk's version
of events. Whether or not one agrees with the implications of
Rothe-Kushel's question, he posed no physical threat to either Ross
or the audience, and was simply trying to speak. Woolfolk remained
reasonable and polite. The guards' rapid recourse to shouting and to
physical violence to detain Rothe-Kushel and Woolfolk did not seem to
have a basis other than that the guards were nervous in the presence
of a former top US official and that Rothe-Kushel was a local
activist who was well-known for asking confrontational questions at
public events. On entering the library, Rothe-Kushel had been
identified by Hawkins and subjected to a more thorough search than
had the other patrons. The off-duty police acting as guards seem to
have been confused about the exact nature of their duties-and about
where they were.
The arrests went unmentioned in the national press, in part because
of the library officials' hope that the incident-which Library
Director Crosby Kemper III has described as an "overreaction"-would
simply blow over and the charges against Woolfolk and Rothe-Kushel
dropped. The case gained new attention, however, in late September,
when the library drew support from the American Library Association
and the Bill of Rights Defense Committee. (Over the years the
American Library Association's position has been that freedom of
speech-and our right to information-is absolute and indivisible,
regardless of the nature of that speech and the content of that
information. In 2003, the ALA went to the Supreme Court in an
unsuccessful attempt to reverse the Children's Internet Protection
Act, which requires that publically funded libraries install filters
to screen out material that might be considered obscene or unsuitable
for children.) On October 5, the Forward published
an <http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/351309/jewish-man-arrested-for-questioning-israeli-state-sponsored-terrorism-at-ka/>article criticizing
the security guards' behavior, and this week, a local newspaper, The
Pitch,
has <http://www.pitch.com/news/feature-story/article/20836631/arrests-at-a-kansas-city-public-library-event-show-how-the-lines-blur-when-offduty-police-work-private-security>raisedquestions
about the off-duty police officers involved in the case.
For a while, library officials hoped that an accord might be reached
between the library and the prosecutor's office; if the defendants
agree to refrain from filing a civil suit, the charges against them
will most likely be dropped. But the prosecutor's office has
announced that it (in co-operation with Hawkins's employer, the
Jewish Community Foundation) will go forward with the cases against
the both the librarian and the patron.
Kansas City Public Library, Kansas City, Missouri
Photo credit: Jonathan Moreau via Flickr // The New York
Review of Books
Whatever the outcome, the case adds to a growing history of attacks
on libraries-simply for upholding the bedrock values that have
historically made them so important. Originally passed in 2001 and
since reauthorized and amended, the USA PATRIOT Act-in particular its
section 215-has given the FBI the power to request library borrowing
records, patron lists, computer hard drives and Internet logs. In a
speech in 2003, then Attorney General John Ashcroft claimed that the
understandably concerned librarians were suffering from a "baseless
hysteria," repeating the word "hysteria" several times.
Two years later a group of Connecticut librarians (who came to be
known as "the Connecticut Four") resisted a government request to
turn over the names and online activity of everyone who had used a
certain library computer; the librarians were served with a gag order
forbidding them to discuss the case. After their situation attracted
the attention of the ACLU, the gag order was rescinded by the FBI in
2006; the following year, the Connecticut Four received the Paul
Howard Award for Courage.
In 2005, Joan Airoldi, a librarian in rural Washington State,
received the PEN/Newman's Own First Amendment Award for defying an
FBI demand for a list of patrons who had borrowed a biography of
Osama bin Laden. And just two weeks ago, four off-duty policeman from
the Grandview Police Department (working part-time as security guards
at another Kansas City library, the Mid-Continent Library) objected
to that library's decision to put up a display case entitled "Black
Lives Matter- Books About African American Experiences" and featuring
novels by Toni Morrison and others. Even after the library agreed to
adjust the exhibit sign's language to read "Books about Black
Lives-The African American Experience," two of the four officers
resigned in protest.
Part of what's disturbing about both Kansas City incidents is the
extent to which they illustrate the gap that has opened between
police and the communities in which they work-a divide that, with
horrifying regularity, produces far more disastrous and violent
results in our inner cities. In fact, public libraries are among the
very few remaining places where all Americans can meet to exchange
ideas and listen to opposing viewpoints for free.
According to the <http://www.librariesforreallife.org/>Libraries for
Real Life Project, an organization founded within Wisconsin's South
Central Library System, 68 percent of Americans have library cards.
Americans borrow more than two billion items from libraries every
year. Anyone can go to a public library (again, for free) to learn
computer skills and apply for jobs. Immigrants can receive help in
obtaining green cards and passing citizenship tests, and can learn
and practice English. Senior citizens can find out how to take
advantage of their social security benefits, and children can attend
story hours and early-reading classes. And at least partly because of
their own experience with government surveillance, libraries all over
the country have begun to conduct workshops designed to teach patrons
how to protect their privacy online.
I spent some of the happiest times of my childhood in Brooklyn's
Grand Army Plaza Library, which now, like many libraries, has
expanded its services in response to the needs of the communities it
serves. Along with eleven other Brooklyn libraries, it has created
rooms in which the families of prisoners (especially those who cannot
afford to visit their incarcerated relatives) can chat with them via
video conferencing; in the same rooms with the monitors and cameras
are children's books, and during these "televisits," prisoners are
encouraged to read books with their kids. On October 29, again at the
Grand Army Plaza library, a group of actors
will <http://www.bklynlibrary.org/calendar/theater-war-hercules-broo-central-library-102916>perform a
little known and especially violent Euripides play, The Madness of
Hercules, and use it as the jumping-off point for a discussion of gun
violence; the audience of several hundred will include local
schoolchildren and members of the New York City police department.
The right to read, to think, to discuss and listen to ideas in a
public forum is essential to an open society, as is our individual
privacy. One hopes that the Kansas City case-only the most recent of
many-will be resolved without further cost, trouble and damage, and
that librarians there and everywhere will be able to do their jobs
without taking on the added burden of battling for our freedom.
[Francine Prose is a Distinguished Visiting Writer at Bard. Her new
novel, Mister Monkey, will be published later this month. (October
2016)]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.eril-l.org/pipermail/eril-l-eril-l.org/attachments/20161021/7afc5983/attachment.html>
More information about the Eril-l
mailing list